<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gender Genie</title>
	<link>http://www.marktaw.com/wordpress/2007/04/19/the-gender-genie/</link>
	<description>The Psychology of Marketing and The Marketing of Psychology.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 01:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.marktaw.com/wordpress/2007/04/19/the-gender-genie/#comment-481</link>
		<author>Emma</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marktaw.com/wordpress/2007/04/19/the-gender-genie/#comment-481</guid>
					<description>I'd love to see the other ones you mentioned, if you ever do remeber where they were. I'm not sure where the 80% stat that the authors claimed in the article came from. The stats on their own website show that it performs barely better than chance:

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/stats.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see the other ones you mentioned, if you ever do remeber where they were. I&#8217;m not sure where the 80% stat that the authors claimed in the article came from. The stats on their own website show that it performs barely better than chance:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/stats.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/stats.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
